1			==============================
2			UNEVICTABLE LRU INFRASTRUCTURE
3			==============================
4
5========
6CONTENTS
7========
8
9 (*) The Unevictable LRU
10
11     - The unevictable page list.
12     - Memory control group interaction.
13     - Marking address spaces unevictable.
14     - Detecting Unevictable Pages.
15     - vmscan's handling of unevictable pages.
16
17 (*) mlock()'d pages.
18
19     - History.
20     - Basic management.
21     - mlock()/mlockall() system call handling.
22     - Filtering special vmas.
23     - munlock()/munlockall() system call handling.
24     - Migrating mlocked pages.
25     - Compacting mlocked pages.
26     - mmap(MAP_LOCKED) system call handling.
27     - munmap()/exit()/exec() system call handling.
28     - try_to_unmap().
29     - try_to_munlock() reverse map scan.
30     - Page reclaim in shrink_*_list().
31
32
33============
34INTRODUCTION
35============
36
37This document describes the Linux memory manager's "Unevictable LRU"
38infrastructure and the use of this to manage several types of "unevictable"
39pages.
40
41The document attempts to provide the overall rationale behind this mechanism
42and the rationale for some of the design decisions that drove the
43implementation.  The latter design rationale is discussed in the context of an
44implementation description.  Admittedly, one can obtain the implementation
45details - the "what does it do?" - by reading the code.  One hopes that the
46descriptions below add value by provide the answer to "why does it do that?".
47
48
49===================
50THE UNEVICTABLE LRU
51===================
52
53The Unevictable LRU facility adds an additional LRU list to track unevictable
54pages and to hide these pages from vmscan.  This mechanism is based on a patch
55by Larry Woodman of Red Hat to address several scalability problems with page
56reclaim in Linux.  The problems have been observed at customer sites on large
57memory x86_64 systems.
58
59To illustrate this with an example, a non-NUMA x86_64 platform with 128GB of
60main memory will have over 32 million 4k pages in a single zone.  When a large
61fraction of these pages are not evictable for any reason [see below], vmscan
62will spend a lot of time scanning the LRU lists looking for the small fraction
63of pages that are evictable.  This can result in a situation where all CPUs are
64spending 100% of their time in vmscan for hours or days on end, with the system
65completely unresponsive.
66
67The unevictable list addresses the following classes of unevictable pages:
68
69 (*) Those owned by ramfs.
70
71 (*) Those mapped into SHM_LOCK'd shared memory regions.
72
73 (*) Those mapped into VM_LOCKED [mlock()ed] VMAs.
74
75The infrastructure may also be able to handle other conditions that make pages
76unevictable, either by definition or by circumstance, in the future.
77
78
79THE UNEVICTABLE PAGE LIST
80-------------------------
81
82The Unevictable LRU infrastructure consists of an additional, per-zone, LRU list
83called the "unevictable" list and an associated page flag, PG_unevictable, to
84indicate that the page is being managed on the unevictable list.
85
86The PG_unevictable flag is analogous to, and mutually exclusive with, the
87PG_active flag in that it indicates on which LRU list a page resides when
88PG_lru is set.
89
90The Unevictable LRU infrastructure maintains unevictable pages on an additional
91LRU list for a few reasons:
92
93 (1) We get to "treat unevictable pages just like we treat other pages in the
94     system - which means we get to use the same code to manipulate them, the
95     same code to isolate them (for migrate, etc.), the same code to keep track
96     of the statistics, etc..." [Rik van Riel]
97
98 (2) We want to be able to migrate unevictable pages between nodes for memory
99     defragmentation, workload management and memory hotplug.  The linux kernel
100     can only migrate pages that it can successfully isolate from the LRU
101     lists.  If we were to maintain pages elsewhere than on an LRU-like list,
102     where they can be found by isolate_lru_page(), we would prevent their
103     migration, unless we reworked migration code to find the unevictable pages
104     itself.
105
106
107The unevictable list does not differentiate between file-backed and anonymous,
108swap-backed pages.  This differentiation is only important while the pages are,
109in fact, evictable.
110
111The unevictable list benefits from the "arrayification" of the per-zone LRU
112lists and statistics originally proposed and posted by Christoph Lameter.
113
114The unevictable list does not use the LRU pagevec mechanism. Rather,
115unevictable pages are placed directly on the page's zone's unevictable list
116under the zone lru_lock.  This allows us to prevent the stranding of pages on
117the unevictable list when one task has the page isolated from the LRU and other
118tasks are changing the "evictability" state of the page.
119
120
121MEMORY CONTROL GROUP INTERACTION
122--------------------------------
123
124The unevictable LRU facility interacts with the memory control group [aka
125memory controller; see Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt] by extending the
126lru_list enum.
127
128The memory controller data structure automatically gets a per-zone unevictable
129list as a result of the "arrayification" of the per-zone LRU lists (one per
130lru_list enum element).  The memory controller tracks the movement of pages to
131and from the unevictable list.
132
133When a memory control group comes under memory pressure, the controller will
134not attempt to reclaim pages on the unevictable list.  This has a couple of
135effects:
136
137 (1) Because the pages are "hidden" from reclaim on the unevictable list, the
138     reclaim process can be more efficient, dealing only with pages that have a
139     chance of being reclaimed.
140
141 (2) On the other hand, if too many of the pages charged to the control group
142     are unevictable, the evictable portion of the working set of the tasks in
143     the control group may not fit into the available memory.  This can cause
144     the control group to thrash or to OOM-kill tasks.
145
146
147MARKING ADDRESS SPACES UNEVICTABLE
148----------------------------------
149
150For facilities such as ramfs none of the pages attached to the address space
151may be evicted.  To prevent eviction of any such pages, the AS_UNEVICTABLE
152address space flag is provided, and this can be manipulated by a filesystem
153using a number of wrapper functions:
154
155 (*) void mapping_set_unevictable(struct address_space *mapping);
156
157	Mark the address space as being completely unevictable.
158
159 (*) void mapping_clear_unevictable(struct address_space *mapping);
160
161	Mark the address space as being evictable.
162
163 (*) int mapping_unevictable(struct address_space *mapping);
164
165	Query the address space, and return true if it is completely
166	unevictable.
167
168These are currently used in two places in the kernel:
169
170 (1) By ramfs to mark the address spaces of its inodes when they are created,
171     and this mark remains for the life of the inode.
172
173 (2) By SYSV SHM to mark SHM_LOCK'd address spaces until SHM_UNLOCK is called.
174
175     Note that SHM_LOCK is not required to page in the locked pages if they're
176     swapped out; the application must touch the pages manually if it wants to
177     ensure they're in memory.
178
179
180DETECTING UNEVICTABLE PAGES
181---------------------------
182
183The function page_evictable() in vmscan.c determines whether a page is
184evictable or not using the query function outlined above [see section "Marking
185address spaces unevictable"] to check the AS_UNEVICTABLE flag.
186
187For address spaces that are so marked after being populated (as SHM regions
188might be), the lock action (eg: SHM_LOCK) can be lazy, and need not populate
189the page tables for the region as does, for example, mlock(), nor need it make
190any special effort to push any pages in the SHM_LOCK'd area to the unevictable
191list.  Instead, vmscan will do this if and when it encounters the pages during
192a reclamation scan.
193
194On an unlock action (such as SHM_UNLOCK), the unlocker (eg: shmctl()) must scan
195the pages in the region and "rescue" them from the unevictable list if no other
196condition is keeping them unevictable.  If an unevictable region is destroyed,
197the pages are also "rescued" from the unevictable list in the process of
198freeing them.
199
200page_evictable() also checks for mlocked pages by testing an additional page
201flag, PG_mlocked (as wrapped by PageMlocked()), which is set when a page is
202faulted into a VM_LOCKED vma, or found in a vma being VM_LOCKED.
203
204
205VMSCAN'S HANDLING OF UNEVICTABLE PAGES
206--------------------------------------
207
208If unevictable pages are culled in the fault path, or moved to the unevictable
209list at mlock() or mmap() time, vmscan will not encounter the pages until they
210have become evictable again (via munlock() for example) and have been "rescued"
211from the unevictable list.  However, there may be situations where we decide,
212for the sake of expediency, to leave a unevictable page on one of the regular
213active/inactive LRU lists for vmscan to deal with.  vmscan checks for such
214pages in all of the shrink_{active|inactive|page}_list() functions and will
215"cull" such pages that it encounters: that is, it diverts those pages to the
216unevictable list for the zone being scanned.
217
218There may be situations where a page is mapped into a VM_LOCKED VMA, but the
219page is not marked as PG_mlocked.  Such pages will make it all the way to
220shrink_page_list() where they will be detected when vmscan walks the reverse
221map in try_to_unmap().  If try_to_unmap() returns SWAP_MLOCK,
222shrink_page_list() will cull the page at that point.
223
224To "cull" an unevictable page, vmscan simply puts the page back on the LRU list
225using putback_lru_page() - the inverse operation to isolate_lru_page() - after
226dropping the page lock.  Because the condition which makes the page unevictable
227may change once the page is unlocked, putback_lru_page() will recheck the
228unevictable state of a page that it places on the unevictable list.  If the
229page has become unevictable, putback_lru_page() removes it from the list and
230retries, including the page_unevictable() test.  Because such a race is a rare
231event and movement of pages onto the unevictable list should be rare, these
232extra evictabilty checks should not occur in the majority of calls to
233putback_lru_page().
234
235
236=============
237MLOCKED PAGES
238=============
239
240The unevictable page list is also useful for mlock(), in addition to ramfs and
241SYSV SHM.  Note that mlock() is only available in CONFIG_MMU=y situations; in
242NOMMU situations, all mappings are effectively mlocked.
243
244
245HISTORY
246-------
247
248The "Unevictable mlocked Pages" infrastructure is based on work originally
249posted by Nick Piggin in an RFC patch entitled "mm: mlocked pages off LRU".
250Nick posted his patch as an alternative to a patch posted by Christoph Lameter
251to achieve the same objective: hiding mlocked pages from vmscan.
252
253In Nick's patch, he used one of the struct page LRU list link fields as a count
254of VM_LOCKED VMAs that map the page.  This use of the link field for a count
255prevented the management of the pages on an LRU list, and thus mlocked pages
256were not migratable as isolate_lru_page() could not find them, and the LRU list
257link field was not available to the migration subsystem.
258
259Nick resolved this by putting mlocked pages back on the lru list before
260attempting to isolate them, thus abandoning the count of VM_LOCKED VMAs.  When
261Nick's patch was integrated with the Unevictable LRU work, the count was
262replaced by walking the reverse map to determine whether any VM_LOCKED VMAs
263mapped the page.  More on this below.
264
265
266BASIC MANAGEMENT
267----------------
268
269mlocked pages - pages mapped into a VM_LOCKED VMA - are a class of unevictable
270pages.  When such a page has been "noticed" by the memory management subsystem,
271the page is marked with the PG_mlocked flag.  This can be manipulated using the
272PageMlocked() functions.
273
274A PG_mlocked page will be placed on the unevictable list when it is added to
275the LRU.  Such pages can be "noticed" by memory management in several places:
276
277 (1) in the mlock()/mlockall() system call handlers;
278
279 (2) in the mmap() system call handler when mmapping a region with the
280     MAP_LOCKED flag;
281
282 (3) mmapping a region in a task that has called mlockall() with the MCL_FUTURE
283     flag
284
285 (4) in the fault path, if mlocked pages are "culled" in the fault path,
286     and when a VM_LOCKED stack segment is expanded; or
287
288 (5) as mentioned above, in vmscan:shrink_page_list() when attempting to
289     reclaim a page in a VM_LOCKED VMA via try_to_unmap()
290
291all of which result in the VM_LOCKED flag being set for the VMA if it doesn't
292already have it set.
293
294mlocked pages become unlocked and rescued from the unevictable list when:
295
296 (1) mapped in a range unlocked via the munlock()/munlockall() system calls;
297
298 (2) munmap()'d out of the last VM_LOCKED VMA that maps the page, including
299     unmapping at task exit;
300
301 (3) when the page is truncated from the last VM_LOCKED VMA of an mmapped file;
302     or
303
304 (4) before a page is COW'd in a VM_LOCKED VMA.
305
306
307mlock()/mlockall() SYSTEM CALL HANDLING
308---------------------------------------
309
310Both [do_]mlock() and [do_]mlockall() system call handlers call mlock_fixup()
311for each VMA in the range specified by the call.  In the case of mlockall(),
312this is the entire active address space of the task.  Note that mlock_fixup()
313is used for both mlocking and munlocking a range of memory.  A call to mlock()
314an already VM_LOCKED VMA, or to munlock() a VMA that is not VM_LOCKED is
315treated as a no-op, and mlock_fixup() simply returns.
316
317If the VMA passes some filtering as described in "Filtering Special Vmas"
318below, mlock_fixup() will attempt to merge the VMA with its neighbors or split
319off a subset of the VMA if the range does not cover the entire VMA.  Once the
320VMA has been merged or split or neither, mlock_fixup() will call
321populate_vma_page_range() to fault in the pages via get_user_pages() and to
322mark the pages as mlocked via mlock_vma_page().
323
324Note that the VMA being mlocked might be mapped with PROT_NONE.  In this case,
325get_user_pages() will be unable to fault in the pages.  That's okay.  If pages
326do end up getting faulted into this VM_LOCKED VMA, we'll handle them in the
327fault path or in vmscan.
328
329Also note that a page returned by get_user_pages() could be truncated or
330migrated out from under us, while we're trying to mlock it.  To detect this,
331populate_vma_page_range() checks page_mapping() after acquiring the page lock.
332If the page is still associated with its mapping, we'll go ahead and call
333mlock_vma_page().  If the mapping is gone, we just unlock the page and move on.
334In the worst case, this will result in a page mapped in a VM_LOCKED VMA
335remaining on a normal LRU list without being PageMlocked().  Again, vmscan will
336detect and cull such pages.
337
338mlock_vma_page() will call TestSetPageMlocked() for each page returned by
339get_user_pages().  We use TestSetPageMlocked() because the page might already
340be mlocked by another task/VMA and we don't want to do extra work.  We
341especially do not want to count an mlocked page more than once in the
342statistics.  If the page was already mlocked, mlock_vma_page() need do nothing
343more.
344
345If the page was NOT already mlocked, mlock_vma_page() attempts to isolate the
346page from the LRU, as it is likely on the appropriate active or inactive list
347at that time.  If the isolate_lru_page() succeeds, mlock_vma_page() will put
348back the page - by calling putback_lru_page() - which will notice that the page
349is now mlocked and divert the page to the zone's unevictable list.  If
350mlock_vma_page() is unable to isolate the page from the LRU, vmscan will handle
351it later if and when it attempts to reclaim the page.
352
353
354FILTERING SPECIAL VMAS
355----------------------
356
357mlock_fixup() filters several classes of "special" VMAs:
358
3591) VMAs with VM_IO or VM_PFNMAP set are skipped entirely.  The pages behind
360   these mappings are inherently pinned, so we don't need to mark them as
361   mlocked.  In any case, most of the pages have no struct page in which to so
362   mark the page.  Because of this, get_user_pages() will fail for these VMAs,
363   so there is no sense in attempting to visit them.
364
3652) VMAs mapping hugetlbfs page are already effectively pinned into memory.  We
366   neither need nor want to mlock() these pages.  However, to preserve the
367   prior behavior of mlock() - before the unevictable/mlock changes -
368   mlock_fixup() will call make_pages_present() in the hugetlbfs VMA range to
369   allocate the huge pages and populate the ptes.
370
3713) VMAs with VM_DONTEXPAND are generally userspace mappings of kernel pages,
372   such as the VDSO page, relay channel pages, etc. These pages
373   are inherently unevictable and are not managed on the LRU lists.
374   mlock_fixup() treats these VMAs the same as hugetlbfs VMAs.  It calls
375   make_pages_present() to populate the ptes.
376
377Note that for all of these special VMAs, mlock_fixup() does not set the
378VM_LOCKED flag.  Therefore, we won't have to deal with them later during
379munlock(), munmap() or task exit.  Neither does mlock_fixup() account these
380VMAs against the task's "locked_vm".
381
382
383munlock()/munlockall() SYSTEM CALL HANDLING
384-------------------------------------------
385
386The munlock() and munlockall() system calls are handled by the same functions -
387do_mlock[all]() - as the mlock() and mlockall() system calls with the unlock vs
388lock operation indicated by an argument.  So, these system calls are also
389handled by mlock_fixup().  Again, if called for an already munlocked VMA,
390mlock_fixup() simply returns.  Because of the VMA filtering discussed above,
391VM_LOCKED will not be set in any "special" VMAs.  So, these VMAs will be
392ignored for munlock.
393
394If the VMA is VM_LOCKED, mlock_fixup() again attempts to merge or split off the
395specified range.  The range is then munlocked via the function
396populate_vma_page_range() - the same function used to mlock a VMA range -
397passing a flag to indicate that munlock() is being performed.
398
399Because the VMA access protections could have been changed to PROT_NONE after
400faulting in and mlocking pages, get_user_pages() was unreliable for visiting
401these pages for munlocking.  Because we don't want to leave pages mlocked,
402get_user_pages() was enhanced to accept a flag to ignore the permissions when
403fetching the pages - all of which should be resident as a result of previous
404mlocking.
405
406For munlock(), populate_vma_page_range() unlocks individual pages by calling
407munlock_vma_page().  munlock_vma_page() unconditionally clears the PG_mlocked
408flag using TestClearPageMlocked().  As with mlock_vma_page(),
409munlock_vma_page() use the Test*PageMlocked() function to handle the case where
410the page might have already been unlocked by another task.  If the page was
411mlocked, munlock_vma_page() updates that zone statistics for the number of
412mlocked pages.  Note, however, that at this point we haven't checked whether
413the page is mapped by other VM_LOCKED VMAs.
414
415We can't call try_to_munlock(), the function that walks the reverse map to
416check for other VM_LOCKED VMAs, without first isolating the page from the LRU.
417try_to_munlock() is a variant of try_to_unmap() and thus requires that the page
418not be on an LRU list [more on these below].  However, the call to
419isolate_lru_page() could fail, in which case we couldn't try_to_munlock().  So,
420we go ahead and clear PG_mlocked up front, as this might be the only chance we
421have.  If we can successfully isolate the page, we go ahead and
422try_to_munlock(), which will restore the PG_mlocked flag and update the zone
423page statistics if it finds another VMA holding the page mlocked.  If we fail
424to isolate the page, we'll have left a potentially mlocked page on the LRU.
425This is fine, because we'll catch it later if and if vmscan tries to reclaim
426the page.  This should be relatively rare.
427
428
429MIGRATING MLOCKED PAGES
430-----------------------
431
432A page that is being migrated has been isolated from the LRU lists and is held
433locked across unmapping of the page, updating the page's address space entry
434and copying the contents and state, until the page table entry has been
435replaced with an entry that refers to the new page.  Linux supports migration
436of mlocked pages and other unevictable pages.  This involves simply moving the
437PG_mlocked and PG_unevictable states from the old page to the new page.
438
439Note that page migration can race with mlocking or munlocking of the same page.
440This has been discussed from the mlock/munlock perspective in the respective
441sections above.  Both processes (migration and m[un]locking) hold the page
442locked.  This provides the first level of synchronization.  Page migration
443zeros out the page_mapping of the old page before unlocking it, so m[un]lock
444can skip these pages by testing the page mapping under page lock.
445
446To complete page migration, we place the new and old pages back onto the LRU
447after dropping the page lock.  The "unneeded" page - old page on success, new
448page on failure - will be freed when the reference count held by the migration
449process is released.  To ensure that we don't strand pages on the unevictable
450list because of a race between munlock and migration, page migration uses the
451putback_lru_page() function to add migrated pages back to the LRU.
452
453
454COMPACTING MLOCKED PAGES
455------------------------
456
457The unevictable LRU can be scanned for compactable regions and the default
458behavior is to do so.  /proc/sys/vm/compact_unevictable_allowed controls
459this behavior (see Documentation/sysctl/vm.txt).  Once scanning of the
460unevictable LRU is enabled, the work of compaction is mostly handled by
461the page migration code and the same work flow as described in MIGRATING
462MLOCKED PAGES will apply.
463
464
465mmap(MAP_LOCKED) SYSTEM CALL HANDLING
466-------------------------------------
467
468In addition the mlock()/mlockall() system calls, an application can request
469that a region of memory be mlocked supplying the MAP_LOCKED flag to the mmap()
470call.  Furthermore, any mmap() call or brk() call that expands the heap by a
471task that has previously called mlockall() with the MCL_FUTURE flag will result
472in the newly mapped memory being mlocked.  Before the unevictable/mlock
473changes, the kernel simply called make_pages_present() to allocate pages and
474populate the page table.
475
476To mlock a range of memory under the unevictable/mlock infrastructure, the
477mmap() handler and task address space expansion functions call
478populate_vma_page_range() specifying the vma and the address range to mlock.
479
480The callers of populate_vma_page_range() will have already added the memory range
481to be mlocked to the task's "locked_vm".  To account for filtered VMAs,
482populate_vma_page_range() returns the number of pages NOT mlocked.  All of the
483callers then subtract a non-negative return value from the task's locked_vm.  A
484negative return value represent an error - for example, from get_user_pages()
485attempting to fault in a VMA with PROT_NONE access.  In this case, we leave the
486memory range accounted as locked_vm, as the protections could be changed later
487and pages allocated into that region.
488
489
490munmap()/exit()/exec() SYSTEM CALL HANDLING
491-------------------------------------------
492
493When unmapping an mlocked region of memory, whether by an explicit call to
494munmap() or via an internal unmap from exit() or exec() processing, we must
495munlock the pages if we're removing the last VM_LOCKED VMA that maps the pages.
496Before the unevictable/mlock changes, mlocking did not mark the pages in any
497way, so unmapping them required no processing.
498
499To munlock a range of memory under the unevictable/mlock infrastructure, the
500munmap() handler and task address space call tear down function
501munlock_vma_pages_all().  The name reflects the observation that one always
502specifies the entire VMA range when munlock()ing during unmap of a region.
503Because of the VMA filtering when mlocking() regions, only "normal" VMAs that
504actually contain mlocked pages will be passed to munlock_vma_pages_all().
505
506munlock_vma_pages_all() clears the VM_LOCKED VMA flag and, like mlock_fixup()
507for the munlock case, calls __munlock_vma_pages_range() to walk the page table
508for the VMA's memory range and munlock_vma_page() each resident page mapped by
509the VMA.  This effectively munlocks the page, only if this is the last
510VM_LOCKED VMA that maps the page.
511
512
513try_to_unmap()
514--------------
515
516Pages can, of course, be mapped into multiple VMAs.  Some of these VMAs may
517have VM_LOCKED flag set.  It is possible for a page mapped into one or more
518VM_LOCKED VMAs not to have the PG_mlocked flag set and therefore reside on one
519of the active or inactive LRU lists.  This could happen if, for example, a task
520in the process of munlocking the page could not isolate the page from the LRU.
521As a result, vmscan/shrink_page_list() might encounter such a page as described
522in section "vmscan's handling of unevictable pages".  To handle this situation,
523try_to_unmap() checks for VM_LOCKED VMAs while it is walking a page's reverse
524map.
525
526try_to_unmap() is always called, by either vmscan for reclaim or for page
527migration, with the argument page locked and isolated from the LRU.  Separate
528functions handle anonymous and mapped file pages, as these types of pages have
529different reverse map mechanisms.
530
531 (*) try_to_unmap_anon()
532
533     To unmap anonymous pages, each VMA in the list anchored in the anon_vma
534     must be visited - at least until a VM_LOCKED VMA is encountered.  If the
535     page is being unmapped for migration, VM_LOCKED VMAs do not stop the
536     process because mlocked pages are migratable.  However, for reclaim, if
537     the page is mapped into a VM_LOCKED VMA, the scan stops.
538
539     try_to_unmap_anon() attempts to acquire in read mode the mmap semaphore of
540     the mm_struct to which the VMA belongs.  If this is successful, it will
541     mlock the page via mlock_vma_page() - we wouldn't have gotten to
542     try_to_unmap_anon() if the page were already mlocked - and will return
543     SWAP_MLOCK, indicating that the page is unevictable.
544
545     If the mmap semaphore cannot be acquired, we are not sure whether the page
546     is really unevictable or not.  In this case, try_to_unmap_anon() will
547     return SWAP_AGAIN.
548
549 (*) try_to_unmap_file() - linear mappings
550
551     Unmapping of a mapped file page works the same as for anonymous mappings,
552     except that the scan visits all VMAs that map the page's index/page offset
553     in the page's mapping's reverse map priority search tree.  It also visits
554     each VMA in the page's mapping's non-linear list, if the list is
555     non-empty.
556
557     As for anonymous pages, on encountering a VM_LOCKED VMA for a mapped file
558     page, try_to_unmap_file() will attempt to acquire the associated
559     mm_struct's mmap semaphore to mlock the page, returning SWAP_MLOCK if this
560     is successful, and SWAP_AGAIN, if not.
561
562 (*) try_to_unmap_file() - non-linear mappings
563
564     If a page's mapping contains a non-empty non-linear mapping VMA list, then
565     try_to_un{map|lock}() must also visit each VMA in that list to determine
566     whether the page is mapped in a VM_LOCKED VMA.  Again, the scan must visit
567     all VMAs in the non-linear list to ensure that the pages is not/should not
568     be mlocked.
569
570     If a VM_LOCKED VMA is found in the list, the scan could terminate.
571     However, there is no easy way to determine whether the page is actually
572     mapped in a given VMA - either for unmapping or testing whether the
573     VM_LOCKED VMA actually pins the page.
574
575     try_to_unmap_file() handles non-linear mappings by scanning a certain
576     number of pages - a "cluster" - in each non-linear VMA associated with the
577     page's mapping, for each file mapped page that vmscan tries to unmap.  If
578     this happens to unmap the page we're trying to unmap, try_to_unmap() will
579     notice this on return (page_mapcount(page) will be 0) and return
580     SWAP_SUCCESS.  Otherwise, it will return SWAP_AGAIN, causing vmscan to
581     recirculate this page.  We take advantage of the cluster scan in
582     try_to_unmap_cluster() as follows:
583
584	For each non-linear VMA, try_to_unmap_cluster() attempts to acquire the
585	mmap semaphore of the associated mm_struct for read without blocking.
586
587	If this attempt is successful and the VMA is VM_LOCKED,
588	try_to_unmap_cluster() will retain the mmap semaphore for the scan;
589	otherwise it drops it here.
590
591	Then, for each page in the cluster, if we're holding the mmap semaphore
592	for a locked VMA, try_to_unmap_cluster() calls mlock_vma_page() to
593	mlock the page.  This call is a no-op if the page is already locked,
594	but will mlock any pages in the non-linear mapping that happen to be
595	unlocked.
596
597	If one of the pages so mlocked is the page passed in to try_to_unmap(),
598	try_to_unmap_cluster() will return SWAP_MLOCK, rather than the default
599	SWAP_AGAIN.  This will allow vmscan to cull the page, rather than
600	recirculating it on the inactive list.
601
602	Again, if try_to_unmap_cluster() cannot acquire the VMA's mmap sem, it
603	returns SWAP_AGAIN, indicating that the page is mapped by a VM_LOCKED
604	VMA, but couldn't be mlocked.
605
606
607try_to_munlock() REVERSE MAP SCAN
608---------------------------------
609
610 [!] TODO/FIXME: a better name might be page_mlocked() - analogous to the
611     page_referenced() reverse map walker.
612
613When munlock_vma_page() [see section "munlock()/munlockall() System Call
614Handling" above] tries to munlock a page, it needs to determine whether or not
615the page is mapped by any VM_LOCKED VMA without actually attempting to unmap
616all PTEs from the page.  For this purpose, the unevictable/mlock infrastructure
617introduced a variant of try_to_unmap() called try_to_munlock().
618
619try_to_munlock() calls the same functions as try_to_unmap() for anonymous and
620mapped file pages with an additional argument specifying unlock versus unmap
621processing.  Again, these functions walk the respective reverse maps looking
622for VM_LOCKED VMAs.  When such a VMA is found for anonymous pages and file
623pages mapped in linear VMAs, as in the try_to_unmap() case, the functions
624attempt to acquire the associated mmap semaphore, mlock the page via
625mlock_vma_page() and return SWAP_MLOCK.  This effectively undoes the
626pre-clearing of the page's PG_mlocked done by munlock_vma_page.
627
628If try_to_unmap() is unable to acquire a VM_LOCKED VMA's associated mmap
629semaphore, it will return SWAP_AGAIN.  This will allow shrink_page_list() to
630recycle the page on the inactive list and hope that it has better luck with the
631page next time.
632
633For file pages mapped into non-linear VMAs, the try_to_munlock() logic works
634slightly differently.  On encountering a VM_LOCKED non-linear VMA that might
635map the page, try_to_munlock() returns SWAP_AGAIN without actually mlocking the
636page.  munlock_vma_page() will just leave the page unlocked and let vmscan deal
637with it - the usual fallback position.
638
639Note that try_to_munlock()'s reverse map walk must visit every VMA in a page's
640reverse map to determine that a page is NOT mapped into any VM_LOCKED VMA.
641However, the scan can terminate when it encounters a VM_LOCKED VMA and can
642successfully acquire the VMA's mmap semaphore for read and mlock the page.
643Although try_to_munlock() might be called a great many times when munlocking a
644large region or tearing down a large address space that has been mlocked via
645mlockall(), overall this is a fairly rare event.
646
647
648PAGE RECLAIM IN shrink_*_list()
649-------------------------------
650
651shrink_active_list() culls any obviously unevictable pages - i.e.
652!page_evictable(page) - diverting these to the unevictable list.
653However, shrink_active_list() only sees unevictable pages that made it onto the
654active/inactive lru lists.  Note that these pages do not have PageUnevictable
655set - otherwise they would be on the unevictable list and shrink_active_list
656would never see them.
657
658Some examples of these unevictable pages on the LRU lists are:
659
660 (1) ramfs pages that have been placed on the LRU lists when first allocated.
661
662 (2) SHM_LOCK'd shared memory pages.  shmctl(SHM_LOCK) does not attempt to
663     allocate or fault in the pages in the shared memory region.  This happens
664     when an application accesses the page the first time after SHM_LOCK'ing
665     the segment.
666
667 (3) mlocked pages that could not be isolated from the LRU and moved to the
668     unevictable list in mlock_vma_page().
669
670 (4) Pages mapped into multiple VM_LOCKED VMAs, but try_to_munlock() couldn't
671     acquire the VMA's mmap semaphore to test the flags and set PageMlocked.
672     munlock_vma_page() was forced to let the page back on to the normal LRU
673     list for vmscan to handle.
674
675shrink_inactive_list() also diverts any unevictable pages that it finds on the
676inactive lists to the appropriate zone's unevictable list.
677
678shrink_inactive_list() should only see SHM_LOCK'd pages that became SHM_LOCK'd
679after shrink_active_list() had moved them to the inactive list, or pages mapped
680into VM_LOCKED VMAs that munlock_vma_page() couldn't isolate from the LRU to
681recheck via try_to_munlock().  shrink_inactive_list() won't notice the latter,
682but will pass on to shrink_page_list().
683
684shrink_page_list() again culls obviously unevictable pages that it could
685encounter for similar reason to shrink_inactive_list().  Pages mapped into
686VM_LOCKED VMAs but without PG_mlocked set will make it all the way to
687try_to_unmap().  shrink_page_list() will divert them to the unevictable list
688when try_to_unmap() returns SWAP_MLOCK, as discussed above.
689