Lines Matching refs:levels

2 nice-levels implementation in the new Linux scheduler.
4 Nice levels were always pretty weak under Linux and people continuously
12 In the O(1) scheduler (in 2003) we changed negative nice levels to be
54 To sum it up: we always wanted to make nice levels more consistent, but
79 nice levels were not 'punchy enough', so lots of people had to resort to
86 To address the first complaint (of nice levels being not "punchy"
88 (and granularity was made a separate concept from nice levels) and thus
94 To address the second complaint (of nice levels not being consistent),
96 tasks, regardless of their absolute nice levels. So on the new
100 levels were changed to be "multiplicative" (or exponential) - that way
104 The third complaint (of negative nice levels not being "punchy" enough
107 automatically: stronger negative nice levels are an automatic
108 side-effect of the recalibrated dynamic range of nice levels.