Lines Matching refs:it

6 is that since there is only one CPU, it should not be necessary to
9 work a surprising amount of the time, it is a very bad idea in general.
19 is referencing element B when it is interrupted by softirq processing,
35 by having call_rcu() directly invoke its arguments only if it was called
39 elements A, B, and C in process contexts, but that it invokes a function
40 on each element as it is scanned.  Suppose further that this function
41 deletes element B from the list, then passes it to call_rcu() for deferred
42 freeing.  This may be a bit unconventional, but it is perfectly legal
45 its arguments would cause it to fail to make the fundamental guarantee
49 Quick Quiz #1: why is it -not- legal to invoke synchronize_rcu() in
60 In some cases, it would possible to restructure to code so that
85 even on a UP system.  So do not do it!  Even on a UP system, the RCU
99 	Why is it -not- legal to invoke synchronize_rcu() in this case?
133 	simply immediately returned, it would prematurely signal the
135 	that other thread when it started running again.